Any old crap of the thirties is repaid - idiocy of the

News from Bulgaria News from abroad Activity Position Statements Objectives Shares Protests Articles Bulgaria Policy St. Theory Notes on the philosophy of anarchism Theorists of anarchism History Archive materials Makers Organizations Literature Events Video Ideas that we close TV Shows Movies Campaigns Take message Urban transport - of people! Prices rise, to raise and we! Contact Forum
I bring to your attention the article "Listen, Marxist" eco-anarchist Murray Bookchin. In his memory, part of it has been translated and published in the newspaper "Free Thought" in 2006 (number 8 and 9), shortly after his death.
Six years later, out of the Bulgarian and the continuation of the text to make it available to our readers. To keep the authenticity of the Bulgarian translation will display the full text, but in two parts, with annotated and specifications.
Murray Bookchin (1921-2006), social theorist and activist, died on 30 July 2006 at his home in Burlington, Vermont state (USA). Throughout his life Bookchin creates a new grassroots perspective. In 1960 began its "social ecology" inspired several generations of environmental and leftists. His books are often cited by prominent political and social activists around the world. Descendant of Russian immigrants, Bookchin began his political activity early 1930s in the Communist Youth League of the United States, where he was expelled for criticism of Stalinism. Then briefly became a Trotskyist, then turned to anarchism.
First, social conflicts are exported in the 21st century beyond labor relations. Leftist activists are obliged famous food in india to focus efforts not in "workers' struggle" and the urban environment, where deployed conflicts with corporations, corrupt technocrats and residents of endless urban slums.
Bookchin famous food in india is not a classic anarchist. His views he calls libertarian komunalizam. This is a whole complex of ideas, political sense of which lies in the belief that all policy should be conducted locally.
Any old crap of the thirties is repaid - idiocy of the "class line," the "role famous food in india of the working class", "trained personnel", "vanguard party" and "dictatorship of the proletariat." Everything begins famous food in india again in a blatant form than ever. Progressive Labor Party is not the only example, just the worst. Gyubre same person smells in various offshoots of the student movement and the Marxist famous food in india and socialist circles universities, not to mention the Trotskyite groups, the International Socialist circles and Youth against war and fascism.
Come over thirty ponebeshe famous food in india understandable. The United States was paralyzed by a chronic economic crisis, the deepest and longest in its history. The only living forces that seemed to be tossed on the walls of capitalism were powerful famous food in india organizational campaigns of Trade Unions (CIO) with dramatic sit-ins, their radical militancy and violent clashes with police. The political atmosphere in the entire world was charged by the electricity of the Spanish Civil War, the last of the classic workers' revolution, when every radical sect in the American left may indicate its militia columns in Madrid and Barselona. But that was thirty years ago. A time when if someone shouted "Make love, not war" would be considered a freak. Then the slogan was "Make jobs, not war" - slogan of an era marked by scarcity, when the achievement of socialism had to include "victims" and "transition period" to an economy of material abundance. One kid of eighteen in 1937 the idea of the computer generation would have seemed like an impossible science fiction - fantasy comparable with dreams of space travel. This eighteen kid today is now fifty, and its roots are in an era so remote that it has qualitatively famous food in india different from the realities of today in the United States. Capitalism itself has also changed since then, has become increasingly interleaved forms that can predict only dimly thirty years ago. And behold, today again we are told to go back to the "class line," "strategies", "cadres" and the organizational forms of that distant period with almost rude rejection of new problems and opportunities arise.
When, damn it, will finally create a movement that looks to the future rather than the past? When are we going to be learning from what is born, instead of what is dying? Marx, as a last tribute, try to do it in his time; trying to inspire futuristic spirit in the revolutionary movement of the 1840s and 1850s. "The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living - he wrote in the" Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. - And just when it seems that they are about to engage in revolutionizing of Seb